Casetagram is a nifty idea: a case with your Instagram photos printed on it. These make for an incredibly personal product. I love it. You can view a couple of case designs I threw together here.

Casetagram is a nifty idea: a case with your Instagram photos printed on it. These make for an incredibly personal product. I love it. You can view a couple of case designs I threw together here.

pooryorickentertainment:

Design & illustration by Chris Ayers
“The Medusa v. The Odalisque” - B.S. Latrodectus Mactans   Productions. Uncredited cast; zone-plating laser holography by James O.   Incadenza and Urquhart Ogilvie, Jr.; holographic fight choreography by   Kenjiru Hirota courtesy of Sony Entertainment-Asia; 78 mm; 29 minutes;   balck and white; silent w/ audience-noises appropriated from network   broadcast television. Mobile holograms of two visually lethal mythologic   females duel with reflective surfaces onstage while a live crowd of   spectators turn to stone. LIMITED CELLULOID RUN; PRIVATELY RE-RELEASED   ON MAGNETIC VIDEO BY LATRODECTUS MACTANS PRODUCTIONS

Poor Yorick Entertainment is a Tumblr focused on creating visual designs for the characters and events and meta-fictional films in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest.

pooryorickentertainment:

Design & illustration by Chris Ayers

“The Medusa v. The Odalisque” - B.S. Latrodectus Mactans Productions. Uncredited cast; zone-plating laser holography by James O. Incadenza and Urquhart Ogilvie, Jr.; holographic fight choreography by Kenjiru Hirota courtesy of Sony Entertainment-Asia; 78 mm; 29 minutes; balck and white; silent w/ audience-noises appropriated from network broadcast television. Mobile holograms of two visually lethal mythologic females duel with reflective surfaces onstage while a live crowd of spectators turn to stone. LIMITED CELLULOID RUN; PRIVATELY RE-RELEASED ON MAGNETIC VIDEO BY LATRODECTUS MACTANS PRODUCTIONS

Poor Yorick Entertainment is a Tumblr focused on creating visual designs for the characters and events and meta-fictional films in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest.

Generation X Can Get Bent

I’ve had a lot of drafts floating in my head about how badly the world is broken, and how fixing it will require my parents’ generation getting the hell out of the way. Now that a snippy little post called Generation X Doesn’t Want to Hear It is making its rounds, it’s as good a time as any to talk about the world from the next generation’s perspective. We’re not entitled assholes, we’re just fatalistic, cynical, undereducated kids in a fucked-up world.

… Generation X is tired of your sense of entitlement. Generation X also graduated during a recession. It had even shittier jobs, and actually had to pay for its own music. (At least, when music mattered most to it.) Generation X is used to being fucked over. It lost its meager savings in the dot-com bust. Then came George Bush, and 9/11, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Generation X bore the brunt of all that.

So in return, Generation X fucked every future generation. You lacked the meagre political will required to address urgent and upcoming issues, like climate change and a total failure of financial regulation. You looted the public coffers to fund your pensions and retirements, and didn’t follow through on your parents’ investment in infrastructure and research. You took the budding pharmaceutical industry and lost yourself in boners instead of anti-retroviral drugs, and got fat and lazy and bent the world’s food and energy supplies to feed your waistlines and your big cars.

Generation X is a journeyman. It didn’t invent hip hop, or punk rock, or even electronica (it’s pretty sure those dudes in Kraftwerk are boomers) but it perfected all of them, and made them its own. It didn’t invent the Web, but it largely built the damn thing. Generation X gave you Google and Twitter and blogging; Run DMC and Radiohead and Nirvana and Notorious B.I.G. Not that it gets any credit.

Well aren’t you so damned cool.

In fairness, Generation X could use a better spokesperson. Barack Obama is just a little too senior to count among its own, and it has debts older than Mark Zuckerberg. Generation X hasn’t had a real voice since Kurt Cobain blew his brains out, Tupac was murdered, Jeff Mangum went crazy, David Foster Wallace hung himself, Jeff Buckley drowned, River Phoenix overdosed, Elliott Smith stabbed himself (twice) in the heart, Axl got fat.

Quitters. Generation X couldn’t hack it, so you mic’ed out.

Right now, Generation X just wants a beer and to be left alone. It just wants to sit here quietly and think for a minute.

Aww, you can’t handle the stress? The impending societal breakdown? The unsolved crises, the forced admittance of your mistakes? Then get the fuck out of our way. We’re going to have to declare bankruptcy, take back your pensions (jesus, do you all not understand how basic accounting works? Oh wait, if you’d funded education instead of cutting it to the bone, maybe you’d know how math works), cut your retirement benefits, and try to salvage what’s left of the world. Thanks for a shitload of houses in useless places, crumbling roads, and a trillion dollar war (you assholes elected both Bushes, let’s not forget).

You did a hell of a job trashing the car, but if you really need a congratulatory pat on the back to go with your quiet moment, well, thanks for not losing the keys?

About Steve

I’m writing about Steve Jobs’s life, but it’s really not for you, it’s for me.

Steve Jobs was an incredible person to watch move through the world, a person to be awed by, to envy, and to imitate, not because of what he did, or who he inspired, or what he created, but because of his relentless pursuit of a better self.

Many stories have been told about the young, brash, passionate co-founder of Apple, and many more about his fine design taste and the fight for simplicity waged since he returned. Far more interesting is his evolutionary arc, sketched out as clear as daylight across the companies he led between his first and second eras at Apple. He continually honed his taste, and constantly questioned what was possible to do with bits and atoms and photons. He refined his approach for convincing people that his vision, grand and beautiful, deserved to exist. He grew personally, first as a father, and later as a messiah of sorts, saving his first company from the brink and creating a world that he perhaps had always dreamed of, but one which the rest of us could barely imagine until it was before our eyes.

My former coworkers and I loved making him the things he wanted: we made them because he asked, and we made them great because he demanded.

I only interacted with Steve twice, but I miss him deeply and severely. I admire his drive and vision and relentlessness, his constant, unyielding search and fight for aesthetic perfection. I dream of growth and maturity and a trajectory of my own even a tenth as meteoric, and know that his vision and passion and fine taste will carry on for a long time to come.

(Source: minimumviablepants)

(via curvedwhite)

[daily dose of imagery]: Rainy Flatiron

[daily dose of imagery]: Rainy Flatiron

thekidshouldseethis:

Time lapse clouds and fog, taken around the San Francisco Bay Area by Oakland-based Swiss animator and photographer Simon Christen.

Thanks, @cosentino.

I ride my bike home and watch the fog creeping over Twin Peaks almost every afternoon. It’s always lovely.

(Source: boohooboo)

Why software patents are not fixable – Marco.org

Marco presents an cogent argument for why software patents, as a type of issued patent, are in basic violation of both the U.S. Code sections surrounding patents and previous judicial rulings on the topic. (Read his post, then follow it up with a very well-written [Wikipedia] article outlining the establishment and subsequent rulings surrounding patent law.)


What’s missing from the “software patents (suck | are vile | are illegal | are immoral | are a necessary evil)” debate is a discussion of any “next steps”:

If you wanted to kill software patents in one fell swoop, how would you do so? Could Congress declare software patents invalid without sweeping up a lot of much more legitimate hardware or process patents up with them? How will you determine what is and isn’t a software patent? Will you take ones that have been ruled invalid to court? What about the obverse? Assuming you do, what makes a judge any more or less qualified and educated in computer software and hardware than the USPTO to rule what should or shouldn’t fall under a “class invalidation” (let’s call it)? (This may be a trick question, as the current answer seems to be “they probably are”.)

Calls for class-wide invalidation of software patents simply must discuss this topic. Thought experiments about systemic patent reform must take place within the current framework and system, otherwise they’re only experiments in reforming a magical fairy land in which actions like this (i.e. ones with legal recourse and billions of dollars of market impact) simply work or don’t work, and don’t become mired in years of court battles.